<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Solid Blog of Ise &#187; Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.isecore.net/category/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.isecore.net</link>
	<description>I think my toes are jealous of my fingers because they get to point at things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:19:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More Cowboys And Aliens</title>
		<link>http://blog.isecore.net/2010/08/01/more-cowboys-and-aliens/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.isecore.net/2010/08/01/more-cowboys-and-aliens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isecore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isecore.net/?p=816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little more than a year ago I mentioned the upcoming movie &#8220;Cowboys &#038; Aliens&#8221; which I felt looked like a fun time. I recently checked up on it, and now there&#8217;s this intriguing photo of Daniel Craig looking all cowboy-y and wielding some type of alien device. I still say that this looks like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little more than a year ago <a href="http://blog.isecore.net/2009/07/16/cowboys-and-aliens/">I mentioned the upcoming movie &#8220;Cowboys &#038; Aliens&#8221;</a> which I felt looked like a fun time. I recently checked up on it, and now there&#8217;s this intriguing photo of Daniel Craig looking all cowboy-y and wielding some type of alien device.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/danielcraig_cowboys.jpg" rel="lightbox[816]"><img src="http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/danielcraig_cowboys-500x333.jpg" alt="" title="danielcraig_cowboys" width="500" height="333" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-817" /></a></p>
<p>I still say that this looks like a fun movie. It&#8217;s directed by Jon Favreau and stars a lot of pretty big names, among others the aforementioned mr Craig as well as Harrison Ford, Sam Rockwell and Clancy Brown. I think it could be a good, somewhat whacky movie. Fingers crossed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.isecore.net/2010/08/01/more-cowboys-and-aliens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groaning About &#8220;2½ Men&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.isecore.net/2010/04/19/groaning-about-2%c2%bd-men/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.isecore.net/2010/04/19/groaning-about-2%c2%bd-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isecore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isecore.net/?p=724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I live alone I don&#8217;t always enjoy the luxury of humanoid company (my cat really doesn&#8217;t give two hoots about when or what I eat) when eating dinner. Being the borderline white trash that I am, I&#8217;ve thusly taken up the habit of watching shows when I eat in solitude. Mostly I follow the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I live alone I don&#8217;t always enjoy the luxury of humanoid company (my cat really doesn&#8217;t give two hoots about when or what I eat) when eating dinner. Being the borderline white trash that I am, I&#8217;ve thusly taken up the habit of watching shows when I eat in solitude. Mostly I follow the usual garbage such as Lost, V, Flashforward and all that jazz. I tend to prefer light-hearted entertainment though, stuff that doesn&#8217;t require me to think and doesn&#8217;t smack my head if I briefly let my attention focus on transporting nourishment from the plate to my mouth.</p>
<p>So for a while I plowed through things like Friends, Scrubs and similar. Right now I&#8217;m mowing through the 7th season of the Charlie Sheen hell-ride known as &#8220;2½ Men&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now, when this show first started appearing in this country a few years back I thought it was slightly better than most other fast-food type american sitcoms, and I occasionally did let a laugh or to slip out when watching it.</p>
<p>These days though I wonder why in the name of bejesus they keep producing the crap.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just the same old stale sitcom-humor. There&#8217;s nothing original or funny about it, and while it serves it&#8217;s purpose as junkfood for my brain while I shove slightly more healthy food into my mouth, it just boggles my mind why this turd keeps rolling around on television.</p>
<p>The show is basically about Charlie Sheen playing himself. The humor (or lack thereof) is dated, american (not on a good way) and it&#8217;s staler and lamer than a week-old dead duck. Supposedly each episode costs a shitload of money to produce as well, since Charlie Sheen apparently won&#8217;t show up unless someone waves a fat wad of cash or a transsexual prostitute holding a bag of cocaine in front of him.</p>
<p>But, what do I find the most despicable about this elephant-dung of a sitcom? The opening sequence. </p>
<p>You know, where the two and a half men lip-sync to some loopy jazz-type bullshit for about twenty seconds before gazing into the camera like three zombies on crystal meth. Recently, since the half man is growing into his teens they&#8217;ve bolted on this god-awful cheesy morphing sequence where he for a second or two morphs from his preteeny self into the teeny self.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t they take some of the twohundred bazillion gajillion dollars each episode supposedly costs and simply reshoot the opening sequence with the current incarnation of Angus T. Jones rather than slapping some half-assed morphing into it?</p>
<p>It really grinds my gears.</p>
<p>Of course, I could go on pissing and moaning about this televised IQ-drowner. But I&#8217;m not going to, instead I&#8217;m simply going to do what I should&#8217;ve done before starting to watch it, and not watch it any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.isecore.net/2010/04/19/groaning-about-2%c2%bd-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Thoughts: &#8220;Cargo&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.isecore.net/2010/04/18/movie-thoughts-cargo/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.isecore.net/2010/04/18/movie-thoughts-cargo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isecore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isecore.net/?p=718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I watched a movie. It was a swiss german-speaking independent scifi-flick called &#8220;Cargo&#8221; and up until discovering this movie I hadn&#8217;t heard a single word spoken about it. I figured I&#8217;d give it a go, and for some reason I&#8217;m still pondering it. Plus, it&#8217;s an independent production from outside the Hollywood-circus, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night I watched a movie. It was a swiss german-speaking independent scifi-flick called &#8220;<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0381940/">Cargo</a>&#8221; and up until discovering this movie I hadn&#8217;t heard a single word spoken about it. I figured I&#8217;d give it a go, and for some reason I&#8217;m still pondering it.</p>
<p>Plus, it&#8217;s an independent production from outside the Hollywood-circus, and it needs to be mentioned. Plus, it also shows how incredibly stale Hollywood has become in much of it&#8217;s productions, only going into safe and cute territory.</p>
<p>Cargo follows a young woman in her 20s named Laura Portmann. In an unspecified future where Earth has been deemed incapable of sustaining life and where humanity subsides on enormous space-stations in orbit around the supposedly lifeless earth, she enrolls as medical officer aboard a freighter. She needs money in order to visit her sister on Rhea, an earth-like planet in another solar system. Rhea is heavily restricted and you need to pay your way to it. Lauras sister was lucky and won her passage in a lottery, and in video-messages sent between the two Laura long to join her sister.</p>
<p>On the cargo-ship most of the skeleton crew takes turns doing 8-month completely solitary watches while the others spend their time in cryosleep on the four-year journey to Station 42. Supposedly the ship carries equipment for Station 42, but when strange occurences start happening on the ship it&#8217;s revealed that things might not be as clear-cut as Laura first thought when she signed on&#8230;</p>
<p>Yeah, I know. My writeup here sounds like the setting for a bad space-horror type film that heavily rips off Alien. The movie in fact is nothing like it. It&#8217;s a slow-moving and thoughtful piece which borrows heavily from classics such as &#8220;2001: A Space Odyssey&#8221; as well as adding a few turns of it&#8217;s own.</p>
<p>Overall it was a bit strange watching a scifi-flick where everyone speaks german, but after a while you tend to forget it. Visually the film is very impressive, and even though it borrows many concepts quite openly from &#8220;2001&#8243; it does it without ripping it off. It would seem that the movie-makers tried to ground their movie in reality rather than Star Wars-type fantasy, and mostly this seems to hold. Of course, there&#8217;s some incongruous behavior (such as the constantly firing engines of the ship) but overall this is a subdued and sober affair.</p>
<p>So, production-wise there&#8217;s not a lot to complain about. It&#8217;s a polished and visually pretty movie as well as having good sound.</p>
<p>The problems come in the heavy borrowing of themes from other movies. Too much of the movie is essentially a bunch of scifi-staples thrown together to form a movie, and while these themes are always interesting this movie doesn&#8217;t really add anything new to them. It&#8217;s also a bit hindered by the slow tempo which means there isn&#8217;t enough time to explore these themes without making the movie too long. As it stands it introduces the themes and then has to rush ahead to finish the film. A good number of plot-devices are also rather hastily ended and could&#8217;ve used a lot more exposition to make them seem more fully realized, but I understand that there&#8217;s a lot of compromise being done. A minor subplot is also quite annoyingly left completely ignored, even though the outcome of that subplot isn&#8217;t essential to the whole ending.</p>
<p>The acting is a bit wooden, but I suppose that goes well with a movie where one of the primary themes is the dehumanization and isolation in a cold and unforgiving future. Thus I don&#8217;t really know if the wooden acting is intentional or simply something that couldn&#8217;t be avoided. In the end it somehow works in the movies favor.</p>
<p>Overall I guess you could do worse, and it&#8217;s decent enough entertainment provided you don&#8217;t expect the typical Hollywood-fare. This movie is a lot more subdued and slow-moving, which might not be something the twitchy teens might like.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/cargo_ver2.jpg" rel="lightbox[718]"><img src="http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/cargo_ver2-500x713.jpg" alt="" title="cargo_ver2" width="500" height="713" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-719" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.isecore.net/2010/04/18/movie-thoughts-cargo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Ready For Foooootbaaaah!</title>
		<link>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/11/07/get-ready-for-foooootbaaaah/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/11/07/get-ready-for-foooootbaaaah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isecore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isecore.net/?p=502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I watched the premiere of the remade V earlier today. Setting aside my annoyance at the volume of television series being greenlighted in contrast to how little truly original programming (most things seem like either remakes or different versions of things that already has been done) we see today, I still felt this was a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the premiere of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_%282009_TV_series%29">remade V</a> earlier today. Setting aside my annoyance at the volume of television series being greenlighted in contrast to how little truly original programming (most things seem like either remakes or different versions of things that already has been done) we see today, I still felt this was a somewhat entertaining investment of time.</p>
<p>And I think PVP hit the head on the nail of <a href="http://www.pvponline.com/2009/11/05/touch-down/">how it would happen if it was real</a>. We&#8217;re such a bland and media-soaked society that the aliens would have to do this in order to get our attention.</p>
<p>But the comic made me laugh. Foootbaaah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/11/07/get-ready-for-foooootbaaaah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cowboys And Aliens</title>
		<link>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/07/16/cowboys-and-aliens/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/07/16/cowboys-and-aliens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isecore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isecore.net/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; is the name of an upcoming movie in 2011 which just seems to be perfectly whacky for me. Supposedly it stars Robert Downey Jr in a movie with a somewhat original plot. I stole the summary from IMDB. &#8220;In Silver City, Arizona, Apache Indians and Western settlers must lay their differences aside when an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; is the name of an upcoming movie in 2011 which just seems to be perfectly whacky for me. Supposedly it stars Robert Downey Jr in a movie with a somewhat original plot. I stole the summary <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409847/">from IMDB</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;In Silver City, Arizona, Apache Indians and Western settlers must lay their differences aside when an alien spaceship crash lands in their city.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope Hollywood doesn&#8217;t fudge this up. Sounds wacky and fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/07/16/cowboys-and-aliens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: Watchmen (2009)</title>
		<link>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/07/07/movie-review-watchmen-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/07/07/movie-review-watchmen-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isecore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isecore.net/?p=281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who watches the Watchmen? I did, and here&#8217;s my review. &#8212; Watchmen Action/Drama/Science fiction from 2009 starring among others Malin Akerman, Billy Crudup, Jeffrey Dean Morgan and Jackie Earle Haley. &#8212; Government agent Edward Blake is murdered by being thrown out the window. The vigilante Rorschach starts to investigate, and discovers that Edward Blake also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who watches the Watchmen? I did, and here&#8217;s my review.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409459/">Watchmen</a></p>
<p>Action/Drama/Science fiction from 2009 starring among others Malin Akerman, Billy Crudup, Jeffrey Dean Morgan and Jackie Earle Haley.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Government agent Edward Blake is murdered by being thrown out the window. The vigilante Rorschach starts to investigate, and discovers that Edward Blake also used to be the masked adventurer known as The Comedian. Further investigation leads Rorschach and several other former costumed adventurers to realize that this is much, much bigger than simply one mans death&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>I never read Watchmen as a teenager. I didn&#8217;t develop my fascination for comics until I was well into adulthood, and I read Watchmen as an adult. Immediately I realized why it&#8217;s hailed, and it is without a doubt one of my absolute favorite graphic novels. The themes presented in it are of incredible depth, and it&#8217;s played out against the pastiche of the superhero.</p>
<p>When I first heard that an adaption was to be made I had my doubts, but after seeing the first teaser and then the proper trailer more than a year ago I knew I just had to see this thing.</p>
<p>I can now safely say after two viewings (almost) back-to-back that it&#8217;s always nice when a movie so completely satisfies your expectations. Watchmen is a beautifully orchestrated adaption of source material that by several people has been called &#8220;unfilmable&#8221;. If you thought superheroes were just cheesy guys in spandex with red capes, you have to see this.</p>
<p>The film is set in an an alternate-history 1985. It resembles our own 1985, but with several major as well as minor differences. The most obvious difference is that in this reality, masked superheroes are a fact. Albeit an illegal fact, since they&#8217;ve been outlawed by the Keene Act since 1976. Where this reality diverged from ours is never explicitly stated, but it&#8217;s hinted at that it was in the 1930s and 40s when vigilantes started donning masks and fighting crime that history started to diverge. In the 1970s this diversion was furthered when the Vietnam war was prematurely ended and Nixon was elected president for the third term.</p>
<p>I always liked Watchmen since of all the characters only one has actual superpowers. Everyone else is just as regular as you and I and rely on nothing but gadgets or physical training. Jon Osterman (aka Doctor Manhattan) is the only one with superpowers, and his powers are almost godlike as a stark contrast to everyone else.</p>
<p>The movie deals with multiple themes. A primary theme is the future of humanity, and how far we would be willing to go, and how much we would be willing to sacrifice in order to ensure our own survival. Another theme is that of fate vs chaos, and what we choose to believe in. Several other themes are much subtler.</p>
<p>It should be said that this is NOT in any way, shape or fashion a movie for children. Even when you disregard the weighty themes and how it&#8217;s tackled, the movie still is a very dark and sometimes incredibly violent affair. Pretty much every scene The Comedian appears in is less than palatable, since in stark comparison to his nickname the character is deeply unlikeable. There are people exploding, people having their arms cut off, people being electrocuted as well as various nasty shootings. There&#8217;s also plenty of full-frontal male nudity (since Doctor Manhattan rarely wears clothes) so if that offends you, choose something else to watch.</p>
<p>But, all this violence and gruesome darkness adds to the intenseness of the film. It doesn&#8217;t shy away from being a very adult movie in both visual themes as well as themes of the story. It is not gratuitous in the sense that it serves the story.</p>
<p>There are very few things to flaw this film with. As a fan of the graphic novel it&#8217;s based on I acknowledge that it compresses quite a few events and simplifies some of the backstory, but everything that&#8217;s vital for the story is there. Sure, there&#8217;s also some minor things (such as Rorschach once referring to his mask as precisely his mask, something that he doesn&#8217;t do in the novel) but these are minor and is nothing more than nitpicking.</p>
<p>The casting and acting is spot on, especially Billy Crudup as Doctor Manhattan was precisely as in the comic book. His voice, his mannerism, everything. Dead on. This pretty much goes for all the actors being cast, and they all portray their characters faithful to the novel. Jeffrey Dean Morgan is down-right disturbing as the nihilistic Comedian, especially since he&#8217;s mostly known for his sympathetic roles.</p>
<p>This is a dark, beautiful and intense three-hour ride into an alternate reality, and into the human condition itself almost. It gets two enthusiastic thumbs up from me, I recommend anyone who with a brain-stem to watch it. In short: It&#8217;s awesome, and it might blow your mind.</p>
<p><img src="http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/watchmenposter_final-729244.resized.jpg" alt="watchmenposter_final-729244.resized" title="watchmenposter_final-729244.resized" width="500" height="741" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-286" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/07/07/movie-review-watchmen-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;It&#8217;s Not A Tooomah!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/06/01/its-not-a-tooomah/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/06/01/its-not-a-tooomah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isecore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isecore.net/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this wonderful thing on YouTube. The 100 best lines from various movies presented in 200 seconds. A must-see! It&#8217;s also impressive how many times the Gubernator is featured in his various incarnations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this wonderful thing on YouTube. The 100 best lines from various movies presented in 200 seconds. A must-see! It&#8217;s also impressive how many times <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Schwarzenegger">the Gubernator</a> is featured in his various incarnations.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9QUT0tweX1M&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9QUT0tweX1M&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/06/01/its-not-a-tooomah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s In The Box?</title>
		<link>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/05/17/whats-in-the-box/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/05/17/whats-in-the-box/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 14:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isecore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isecore.net/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days back I discovered a really cool short film called &#8220;What&#8217;s In The Box?&#8221;. As far as I can tell this is some enthusiastic semi-professional filmmakers who decided to make a short and publish it on the interweb. I strongly suggest you watch it since it&#8217;s incredibly intense and atmospheric. And yes, they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days back I discovered a really cool short film called &#8220;What&#8217;s In The Box?&#8221;. As far as I can tell this is some enthusiastic semi-professional filmmakers who decided to make a short and publish it on the interweb. I strongly suggest you watch it since it&#8217;s incredibly intense and atmospheric.</p>
<p>And yes, they borrowed some sounds from Half-Life 2, but it&#8217;s all in good spirit. <a href="http://babel-research.eu/witb/stream/">Go watch it now</a>. It has <a href="http://www.whatsinthebox.nl/">a rather cryptic website</a> as well, which I haven&#8217;t had the patience to decode just yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/05/17/whats-in-the-box/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: The Black Hole (1979)</title>
		<link>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/05/08/movie-review-the-black-hole-1979/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/05/08/movie-review-the-black-hole-1979/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 09:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isecore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isecore.net/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I watched the Disney classic &#8220;The Black Hole&#8221;. I had some thoughts about it so here goes. &#8212; The Black Hole Drama/Scifi from 1979 starring among others Robert Forster, Ernest Borgnine and Maximilian Schell. &#8212; In some unspecified but spacefaring future the research vessel Palomino happens upon a black hole. When closer examined [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night I watched the Disney classic <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078869/">&#8220;The Black Hole&#8221;</a>. I had some thoughts about it so here goes.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>The Black Hole</p>
<p>Drama/Scifi from 1979 starring among others Robert Forster, Ernest Borgnine and Maximilian Schell.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>In some unspecified but spacefaring future the research vessel Palomino happens upon a black hole. When closer examined the crew discovers that there&#8217;s a ship floating right in the eye of the hole. Upon closer inspection this turns out to be the USS Cygnus, a ship that went missing twenty years earlier. At first the ship is presumed to be a derelict, but when they approach it turns out to be quite alive. The crew lands upon the ship, discovering it to be inhabited by strange robots as well as it&#8217;s captain, the eccentric Hans Reinhardt, who has a plan to take the ship into the black hole&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Well, I was prepared that this would be a cheese-fest and boy was it true. Some scifi-films just boggle my mind at how short-sighted they are. This movie manages somehow to squeeze together virtually every &#8217;70s space-cliché and somehow also manages to add quite a lot of Disney-style clichés to the mix. Admittedly though, it does get some things right though. But these drown in the overall mix of overwhelming cheesiness. </p>
<p>This movie has not aged well. The special-effects which must&#8217;ve been quite impressive for it&#8217;s time now look extremely dated. There&#8217;s a lot of shots where things just look off, and Disney opted heavily for various matte paintings which is quite clear in many shots. I thought most of the model-shots however were quite neat, even though they&#8217;re quite clearly model-shots none the less. </p>
<p>I also appreciated some of the craft-design. The spaceship Palomino is a horrible design which looks more at home in a mid-50s b-movie, but I though the Cygnus was quite cool, looking like a gothic cathedral in space. Completely impractical, of course, but cool none the less.</p>
<p>The movie is full of other goofs which generally sour the experience. Cables are visible, actors in suits, and the robots&#8230; oh god. The robots. I absolutely hated the robots Vincent and Bob. Those two robots must be the most horribly designed scifi-robots ever.</p>
<p>When I was finished with the movie I felt that the general plot of a madman lost in space was quite interesting. There&#8217;s a good movie hiding inside a horrible cheesy &#8217;70s scifi film. The very odd ending didn&#8217;t really bowl me over in any positive way, in fact I felt it to be overly pretentious and mystical, but at least it was more unconventional than the rest of the film which is completely standard in every aspect.</p>
<p>So&#8230; to summarize. The Black Hole is parts taken from a good movie that&#8217;s hiding inside a horrible gaudy cheese-fest of a monstrosity. Maybe a remake some day would be nice, where someone straightens up the plot and focuses on the themes presented.</p>
<p>One thing that struck me after viewing this film was when I compared it to another scifi-flick released in the same year: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078748/">Alien</a>. Comparing these two movies is like comparing apples and oranges. They have very little in common. While Black Hole is a throwback escapist science fantasy with strong influences from 20.000 Leagues Under The Sea and a godawful Disney-production that only (thankfully) lacks a dog, Alien is a dark and fully believable science fiction movie.</p>
<p>Recommended just for the experience. If you like kitsch then this is a movie for you.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/black_hole_ver1.jpg" rel="lightbox[23]"><img src="http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/black_hole_ver1-500x669.jpg" alt="black_hole_ver1" title="black_hole_ver1" width="500" height="669" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-24" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.isecore.net/2009/05/08/movie-review-the-black-hole-1979/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten Coolest Movie-Cars Ever!</title>
		<link>http://blog.isecore.net/2007/11/26/top-ten-coolest-movie-cars-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.isecore.net/2007/11/26/top-ten-coolest-movie-cars-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isecore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isecore.net/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are several really cool cars in the world of movies. I decided to list the top ten in my opinion coolest cars that ever thundered across the screen. The criteria set was that it had to be a car (no motorcycles, boats or such) and that it had to be contained within the world [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several really cool cars in the world of movies. I decided to list the top ten in my opinion coolest cars that ever thundered across the screen. The criteria set was that it had to be a car (no motorcycles, boats or such) and that it had to be contained within the world of the big-screen &#8211; no TV-series cars! This quickly turned out to require quite a lot of thinking and consulting my movie-collection in order to find the top ten cars of movies &#8211; but I succeded and here they&#8217;re presented in reverse order.</p>
<p>Buckle your seatbelts, here we go!</p>
<h4>10. 1973 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldsmobile_88">Oldsmobile Delta 88</a> (Essentially every <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000600/">Sam Raimi</a>-movie ever produced.)</h4>
<p>Unfortunately I couldn&#8217;t locate a decent picture of this car, but it&#8217;s well-known to fans of Sam Raimis movies. As most people know, Sam started off directing somewhat weird horror-comedies (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Evil_Dead">Evil Dead</a>) and gradually upgraded himself to hollywood-blockbusters such as the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0145487/">Spider-man</a>-movies.</p>
<p>Back to the car though. We who have loved Sams stranger works are well acquainted with the beige Olds for many years. It&#8217;s first appearance was as the car that brought <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ash_Williams">Ash</a> and his girlfriend to that evil little cabin in the woods. The car itself belonged to Sam Raimi himself, and rumor has it that the same exact car (or at the very least the same model) makes appearances in every movie Sam has directed since then. Personally I haven&#8217;t been able to confirm this, but I know for a fact that it has cameos in many of his movies &#8211; among them Spider-Man from 2002.</p>
<p>Trivia: The third and so far last part of the Evil Dead-series of movies (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106308/">Army of Darkness</a>) told the story of how the powers of the Necronomicon transports Ash to the dark ages. He didn&#8217;t go there alone, however &#8211; the beige Olds was also sucked into the vortex. There&#8217;s a very memorable scene in which Ash opens the trunk of the Olds, and it is briefly shown to contain everything from chemistry-books to bottles of Coca-Cola. What makes this extra hilarious is that word around the campfire has this to be the actual contents of what was in the trunk at the time of the filming.</p>
<h4>9. Lotus Esprit (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076752/">The Spy Who Loved Me</a>)</h4>
<p><img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/lotus_esprit.jpg' alt='lotus_esprit.jpg' class="right" />I know that this skirts the definitions (no boats, etc) I laid out in the beginning, but this is such a cool car I had to include it. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus_Esprit">Esprit</a> is in my opinion one of the truly classic sportscars from the &#8217;70&#8242;s, but Bonds version is of course not just a car &#8211; it&#8217;s also a submarine! My personal opinion is that this car is the only reason to watch an otherwise rather forgettable Bond-movie. Keep in mind though that it&#8217;s just my personal opinion, so all you James Bond-fans don&#8217;t have to flame me all at once! <img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Lotus is these days one of the few car-makers who have managed to avoid being swallowed by one of the multinational conglomerates and thereby stay independent. Even Jaguar and Aston-Martin got swallowed by the corporations. Jaguar is as far as I know still owned by Ford, Bentley is owned by VW and Rolls-Royce by BMW!</p>
<p>According to what I&#8217;ve managed to find there were three vehicles used to film the famous going-into-the-water-scene. The first one was an Esprit that had been modified to allow it to drive into the water without damaging the driver or the car. This vehicle was used for the scenes showing the car going into our out of the water. The second was built to show the transformation from car to submarine and served no other purpose than as a special-effect. The third was a small submarine by the name of Margie Dixon who had undergone surgery to look like the Esprit in submarine-version. The car was nicknamed &#8220;Wet Nellie&#8221; by the filmmakers, in a reference to the autogyro that Bond received from Q in &#8220;<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062512/">You Only Live Twice</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>There was also a completely normal Esprit used for road-scenes, which Roger Moore would drive between takes.</p>
<h4>8. Ford Crown Victoria (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119654/">Men In Black</a>)</h4>
<p><img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/meninblack_ford.jpg' alt='meninblack_ford.jpg' class="right" />I found the first movie about the Men In Black very enjoyable. Contrasting to many other I found the sequel equally and even more enjoyable, I felt that it kept what &#8220;worked&#8221; and discarded everything else. Tommy Lee Jones is wonderful as the terse and laconic agent working for a organization monitoring and policing legal aliens on planet earth.</p>
<p>At one part in the film Jay (Will Smith) makes wise-cracks about how MiB has access to all the advanced technology from around the galaxy yet insists on cruising around in a &#8220;Ford P.O.S&#8221; (P.O.S. of course being in reference to the slang-term &#8220;piece of shit&#8221;). These jokes take an abrupt end when Jay is instructed to press the little red button, and the otherwise ordinary and mundane Ford transforms into a rocket-powered monster surging through the city at the speed of sound while Kay listens to old Elvis-songs.</p>
<p><strong>Memorable quote:</strong></p>
<p>Jay: <em>You do know that Elvis is dead?</em><br />
Kay: <em>No, he&#8217;s not. He just went home.</em></p>
<p><em>(Apologies for the quality of the image)</em></p>
<h4>7. Eleanor (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0187078/">Gone in 60 Seconds</a>)</h4>
<p><img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/eleanor.jpg' alt='eleanor.jpg' class="right" />&#8220;Eleanor&#8221; is the nickname of the heavily modified 1967 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 who is one of the cars in the remake of Gone In 60 Seconds from 2000. In the original movie from 1974 she was a Ford Mustang Mach1 Coupe, but I always like the remake-version much better.</p>
<p>The movie was a fairly big success among the fans, even though it proved to be a disappointment financially. Eleanor managed to become both a cult-car as well as a big celebrity. The demand for Eleanor-mustangs after the film was released was enormous, and this was made even worse that the car only existed on the movie-screen. Several Shelby GT500&#8242;s were custom-built for the movie, and all of them were destroyed when filming ended to prevent unauthorized sales of the cars.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uniqueperformance.com/">Unique Performance</a> realized the potential and developed a system where they bought old Mustangs and converted them to Eleanor-replicas. You can call them up and order one, provided you&#8217;re loaded with cash and have a lot of patience &#8211; each replica is hand-built to order. The price of a replica is unknown, but as the saying goes &#8211; if you have to ask what it costs you probably can&#8217;t afford it.</p>
<h4>6. Bluesmobile (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080455/">Blues Brothers</a>)</h4>
<p><img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/the_bluesmobile.jpg' alt='the_bluesmobile.jpg' class="right" />It should be pointed out that the movie establishes that this car isn&#8217;t really the actual bluesmobile. Elwood traded it away for a microphone before the timeline of the movie, and according to the movie it apparently was a black Cadillac of unknown year or model.</p>
<p>But for every other fan of this movie this is the real deal, and the only Bluesmobile to ever exist.</p>
<p>According to what I&#8217;ve managed to dig up a grand total of 14 (!) black-and-white Dodge Monaco &#8217;74s were used. This was needed since the movie had several spectacular stunts and each vehicle had to be built for a certain purpose. Vehicles that went fast, vehicles that could jump high &#8211; all were needed. In fact, one of the cars was built only to literally fall to pieces when so required!</p>
<p>Blues Brothers held the record for number of cars smashed in one movie for several years. It wasn&#8217;t until it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118747/">own (somewhat less excellent) sequel</a> was released that this record was broken. The main reason behind the over-the-top car-chases was partly based on the attempt to create really outrages chases, but also in order to lampoon earlier movies such as Bullitt or The French Connection.</p>
<p>Apart from the stunts this the movie is extremely entertaining thanks to the numerous musical numbers and cameos from famous musicians.</p>
<h4>5. ECTO-1 (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087332/">Ghostbusters</a>)</h4>
<p><img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/180px-ectomobile.jpg' alt='180px-ectomobile.jpg' class="right" /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ectomobile">ECTO-1</a> is the car that Ghostbusters cruised around in. It served as the company car for their business providing service of the same name. Occasionally referred to as the &#8220;Ectomobile&#8221;, although I&#8217;ve always felt that the correct name is ECTO-1, just as the license-plate says. The name is a derivative of the substance left behind by supernatural beings &#8211; ectoplasm.</p>
<p>The actual vehicle is a Cadillac Miller-Meteor with a loading dock in the rear. It&#8217;s a 1959 year, and this type of car mostly serviced as either ambulances or hearses. In the movie it&#8217;s bought by Ray Stanz for the ludicrous amount of US$4800 &#8211; completely absurd considering this would be about US$10.000 for a car that barely runs under it&#8217;s own power.<img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/180px-ecto-1.jpg' alt='180px-ecto-1.jpg' class="right" /></p>
<p>But after some heavy modification it became an 80&#8242;s icon. Almost anyone who lived during that decade remembers the Ghost Busters and their white car with the funky equipment.</p>
<p>Currently there&#8217;s a Ecto-1 replica for sale, asking price is around US$150.000. This is not the original car, but a replica built by renown car-customizer George Barris. Barris is among others the man who built the original Batmobile, used in the campy series from the 60&#8242;s, and he&#8217;s also well-known for falsely claiming to be involved in building and designing the original Ecto-1.</p>
<p><strong>Trivia:</strong> Ecto-1 was originally supposed to be jet-black, but since a majority of scenes take place at night this meant the car would be almost invisible. The crew instead chose to go with the white paintjob and the red wings.</p>
<h4>4. Batmobile (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096895/">Batman</a>, 1989)</h4>
<p><img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/180px-24bat89.jpg' alt='180px-24bat89.jpg' class="right" />The first time I saw Tim Burtons take on Batman I was 11 years old and watched it in the local grindhouse. Almost immediately it became one of my most loved movies ever, and the Batmobile presented in the movie was a major contributor to this fact. Previously I had only seen the Batmobile in the cheezy 60&#8242;s series, and even though that vehicle had a certain charm it couldn&#8217;t compare to the roaring beast in Tim Burtons interpretation.</p>
<p>No, this was a radically different kind of car. It was long, dark and voice-controlled. The looks combined the sleek elegance of sportscars from the 30&#8242;s with a jet-black exterior and extreme performance. Just like the Gotham City presented in the film it was dark, powerful and dangerous.<br />
<img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/batmobile2.jpg' alt='batmobile2.jpg' class="right" />Various rumours insist that every single gadget on the car was fully functional &#8211; this included the extremely powerful gas turbine powering the vehicle. According to this rumour the gas turbine consumed fuel at such a rate that the car could only be driven for about 15 seconds. Personally I&#8217;m very skeptical to the validity of these rumours, but it would&#8217;ve been neat if it was true.</p>
<p>A few years ago I read an article about some guy in Stockholm who was building his own exact replica of this Batmobile. He constructed it on a custom chassis with a Chrysler V8 for power and some kind of rocket-engine for looks. This vehicle was of course completely road-illegal but apparently it never stopped this guy from occasional night-time cruises around the city preventing crime.</p>
<p>When watching the movies it seems as if the Batmobile is more like driving a boat than a car since it has a gas-throttle instead of a shifter. The car also makes an appearance in the sequel from 1991, where it&#8217;s nefariously sabotaged by The Penguin.</p>
<p>Unfortunately the Batmobile descended into a swamp of silliness when Joel Schumacher took over the helm. At least until&#8230;</p>
<h4>3. The Tumbler (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0372784/">Batman Begins</a>)</h4>
<p><img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/180px-batmanbeginstumbler.jpg' alt='180px-batmanbeginstumbler.jpg' class="right" />Yup, that&#8217;s right! Until Chris Nolan took over and re-invented the franchise. The Batmobile is the only car to nab two spots on this list, and this is solely thanks to it existing in so many different incarnations.</p>
<p>The vehicle presented to us in Batman Begins is more inspired by the vehicle driven by Batman in the &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman:_The_Dark_Knight_Returns">Dark Knight Returns</a>&#8221; comics by Frank Miller. In that comic the &#8220;Batmobile&#8221; is more of an ironic and darkly humorous description for a huge tank. Rather than wheels it&#8217;s equipped with gigantic caterpillar tracks and easily crushes everything in it&#8217;s path.</p>
<p>So, it was obvious to most Batman-fans that was the catalyst for the re-invented Batmobile. In this movie the Batmobile is the result of a secret project conducted by Wayne Enterprises prior to Bruce Wayne becoming Batman. It was designed as a bridging vehicle, to jump across rivers and quickly erect bridges. They never got the bridge-part to work, but the Tumbler worked just fine. Bruce Wayne acquires the vehicle and presto! The new Batmobile is ready &#8211; even though it&#8217;s never referred to as such in the movie.</p>
<p><img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/the_tumbler.jpg' alt='the_tumbler.jpg' class="right" />Chris Nolan was very specific about how he wanted to shoot the vehicle. He wouldn&#8217;t accept any CGI since he felt it wouldn&#8217;t look authentic, and thus a total of six cars was built for the various stunts. Two of them were full-scale and completely drivable, these were used for the road-scenes. The other four were built in smaller scales to shoot the jumps and roof-top chases.</p>
<p>Memorable dialogue:</p>
<p>Radio dispatcher: <em>&#8220;What street is he taking?&#8221;</em><br />
Cop in cruiser: <em>&#8220;He&#8217;s not on a street, he&#8217;s flying on rooftops!&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Confused cop in patrol-car to dispatcher: <em>&#8220;Could you just tell me what it looks like?&#8221;</em><br />
<em>(Tumbler roars past)</em><br />
Cop: <em>&#8220;Uh, never mind!&#8221;</em></p>
<h4>2. Pursuit Special (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079501/">Mad Max</a>)</h4>
<p><img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/285px-pursuitspcl2.jpg' alt='285px-pursuitspcl2.jpg' class="right" />In 1979 a young Mel Gibson made his debut on movie-screens across the globe in what would become a cult-movie. That movie was Mad Max and painted a dystopian vision of an Australia in a not-too-distant future where the bad guys outnumbered the heroic cops. Mel Gibson portrayed Max, the terse and somewhat bitter cop who makes himself an enemy of a motorcycle gang, and loses not only his family but also most of his soul and purpose in life as a result.</p>
<p>Mad Max and especially it&#8217;s two sequels are well-known for two things &#8211; amazing car-chases and outrageous stunts. Even if the first sequel (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082694/">The Road Warrior</a>) introduced a slightly deeper western-derived story the car-chases were always the main attraction for viewers. Right in the middle was Max and his legendary vehicle: the black Pursuit Special.</p>
<p>The Pursuit Special (or as it&#8217;s sometimes called: &#8220;the last of the V8 Interceptors&#8221;) started it&#8217;s life as a fairly ordinary australian musclecar from the early 70&#8242;s. It&#8217;s a Ford Falcon XB GT Coupe, but it wasn&#8217;t until it got transformed into the Pursuit Special that it began it&#8217;s life in fame. Several modifications were made to the car, and during filming of The Road Warrior it was extensively modified as well, with among other things huge gas-tanks to fit into the fuel-starved australian desert where the movie takes place. Several of the modifications were however completely estetic and served no other purpose than looking badass. The huge supercharger sticking out of the hood is the most visual example of this, since it was completely non-functional.</p>
<p>The Mad Max-trilogy set most of the standard for many movies taking place in a post-apocalyptic future. Practically every movie in this genre since then has emulated some aspect of Mad Max or it&#8217;s sequels. The most obvious is Kevin Costers watery epic &#8220;<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114898/">Waterworld</a>&#8221; which by many (including me) is essentially The Road Warrior but on water rather than in the desert. Unfortunately it also lacks everything that made the Mad Max-trilogy so awesome.</p>
<p>Pursuit Special served in two movies. Originally sold after the first movie wrapped it was re-acquired and showed up in the first sequel. The second sequel has no Pursuit Special in it, unfortunately. After that the car survived various tours among private collectors and then ended up in the Cars of the Stars-museum in the UK, where it can be seen together with among others the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_General_Lee">General Lee</a> from the Dukes of Hazzard.</p>
<p><strong>****DRUMROLL****</strong></p>
<h4>1. DeLorean DMC-12 (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088763/">Back to the Future</a>-trilogy)</h4>
<p><img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/delorean_timemachine.jpg' alt='delorean_timemachine.jpg' class="right" />That&#8217;s right! Doc Browns car from the Back To The Future-movies is without a doubt the coolest movie-car ever! This is not the first time that car receives that accolade, various other polls and such around the net concurs with my opinion. Personally I cannot think of a car that beats this one &#8211; not only does it look amazing but it also travels through time as well!</p>
<p>In the movies the time-machine is based on a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Lorean_DMC-12">DeLorean DMC-12</a> from 1981. When BTTF was in pre-production the original plan was that Doc Brown built his time-machine into a refrigerator! This was scrapped when the producers got worried that kids might try to mimic this, climb into their fridges and then get locked inside. The obvious replacement was a car of some kind.</p>
<p>Like Doc Brown himself also points out:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;The way I see it if you&#8217;re gonna build a time-machine, why not do it with some style!?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Also, again according to Doc Brown, the cars stainless steel-body was advantageous for the flux dispersal. That&#8217;s always nice.</p>
<p><img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/delorean_flying.jpg' alt='delorean_flying.jpg' class="right" />The choice of the Delorean was also influenced by the movies plot combined with how the Delorean looked. The producers felt that if a Delorean went back to the &#8217;50s the futuristic styling of the car would make it look like a spaceship, and this added to the anachronistic tone of the film. The numbers for how many cars were used varies depending on source, but according to the comments track on the DVD&#8217;s a total of four were used. Three of them were built and used during filming, of which one got smashed in front of the freight-train. A fourth got chopped open to allow filming inside of the vehicle.</p>
<p>In the three films the time-machine goes through several changes. At the end of the first film it&#8217;s undergone hover-conversion and equipped with a fusion-reactor since providing plutonium for each trip proved to be a giant headache. In the second film it got stolen and used to alter the timeline, and in the beginning of the third film it was discovered in an abandoned mine after having rested there for more than 70 years. It also got struck by lightning several times, as well as being chased by both indians as well as the cavalry.</p>
<p>The sad fate of the time-machine was however to be smashed by a freight-train, but before that happened it gave us three wonderful movies filled with paradoxes, time-travelling, comedy and plenty of insanity.</p>
<p><img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/delorean_landing.jpg' alt='delorean_landing.jpg' class="right" />Despite it&#8217;s own coolness the DMC-12 was never very successful as an automobile. It was heavily plagued by several engineering errors and planning mistakes. In the movie Marty bumps his head repeatedly on the gullwing doors, something that also was common for real-life owners. Add to this that the car was equipped with a badly under-performing engine which in the US version didn&#8217;t exceed more than 130 BHP. It was a common problem as well that the heavy doors (filled with stereo-components, electronics and airconditing equipment) would lock it&#8217;s owner out of the car due to the pistons holding up the doors being under-engineered. Another common occurrence was the draining of the cars battery if said doors were left open too long; this was due to the decision to use halogen-lights for doorlighting, and the thirsty bulbs would quickly drain the battery giving the driver a nasty surprise.</p>
<p><strong>Trivia: </strong>The original script used a test-demolition of a nuclear bomb as the means by which Marty manages to get the 1.21 gigawatt required to activate the flux-capacitor. The Delorean would drive into the explosion, and this would charge the circuits and send Marty back to 1985. Steven Spielberg and the other producers felt however it would be unreasonably expensive to film, as well as difficult to produce convincingly as a special effect. Instead the producers opted for the lighting-strike.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><img src='http://blog.isecore.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/aliens_apc.jpg' alt='aliens_apc.jpg' class="right" />Contender that just didn&#8217;t make the cut: the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armored_personnel_carrier">APC</a> from <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090605/">Aliens</a>. That was also a really nifty car &#8211; the neatest feature probably was that it was bigger inside than outside!</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>There, that summarizes my top-ten list of the most amazing movie-cars ever. The overwhelming deduction one can make from this list is that most of the really cool movie-cars appear in films from the 80&#8242;s.</p>
<p><em>Disclaimer: This list is almost exclusively based on my own personal opinions. I&#8217;ve tried to research the facts presented here to the best of my ability, but any errors or omissions is my own fault. Most of the facts come from my own personal trivia-center inside my head, and I&#8217;ve tried to confirm them as best as possible. Others come from around the net, but apart from chasing down the producers of each film and asking obscure questions this is most likely as good as it&#8217;ll get.</em></p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>(This is a repost of an old entry from before the reboot of this blog.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.isecore.net/2007/11/26/top-ten-coolest-movie-cars-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
